All posts by Steve Stern

Lynn Hill: probably the greatest athlete you’ve never heard of*

*I sort of like ending a sentence with a preposition, but, when I do, I am always aware that I am breaking an old rule and sort of pride myself on being au courant; but – I know, I know,  but again – ending a heading with a preposition is very difficult.

Anyway, back to Lynn Hill. Back in the mid to late 60’s I fell in love with Yosemite and went there alot. Earlier, in the late 50’s and very early 60’s I had a fantasy of being a Mountain Climber (or Mountaineer as they were called: nobody – at least nobody I knew – was a rock climber), I think, primarily, because I had met and even spent a couple of weeks in the Sierras with a couple of well known climbers. Jules Eichorn, and through him, Norman Clyde.

We spent alot of time in the Sierras with ropes and other climbing paraphernalia thinking about climbing but, usually, we just went up mountains we could hike or scramble. At one point I was involved in rescuing a climber who had fallen on Mt. Banner and I watched a doctor (and fellow rescuer) amputate a couple of the resuee’s fingers with a pocket knife. That soured me on anything more than a class four climb.

Anyway, back to Lynn Hill. While we were mostly hiking in the High Country, we kept hearing stories of these crazy guys who were camped at camp 4 in Yosemite Valley. They were starting to climb all the unclimbable walls in The Valley. As an aside, strangely, several of them became interested in outdoor clothing: Doug Tompkins who founded North Face and Esprit, Yvon Chouinard who founded Patagonia, and Royal Robbins. I have no idea of the connection between first class climbers and first class clothing. End aside.

When we would pass through The Valley, we would occasionally even see them trying El Cap or inching up Half Dome. These were climbs that would take the better part of a week and we would watch from the ground for, say, an hour, and it would seem like nobody moved more than an inch. But the climbs got faster and the climbers got better until The Nose was first climbed in 1958 in …47 days using “siege” tactics: climbing in an expedition style using fixed ropes along the length of the route….the second ascent of The Nose was in 1960 by Royal Robbins, Joe Fitschen, Chuck Pratt and Tom Frost, who took seven days in the first continuous climb of the route. (From Wikipedia)

On September 19, 1994, Lynn Hill free climbed El Capitan in less than 24 hours.The greatest climbing feat – by anybody – ever. El Cap is 3900 vertical feet – by any reasonable standard, it is impossible. In 1954, Roger Banister ran the first sub-four minute mile. Now the world record is about 17 seconds less. About a 7% improvement. Lynn Hill’s feat was a 98% improvement – and she free climbed it. Up until, everybody climbed El Cap by hanging onto their ropes and hardware; she climbed it using the ropes and hardware as a safety backup. Anybody who thinks women can’t compete with men should watch Lynn Hill climb. A great athlete and the greatest climber.

Oscars

The other day at lunch, Richard Taylor asked me to post my Oscar predictions – or, atleast, who I want to win. I have not seen all the nominated movies and have no insight on who will win. Who wins the various Oscars is really an Inside the Movie Biz political game. Who do people like, who do they admire but don’t especially like, who did they vote for last year and don’t want to vote for them again – you get the idea. 

I do obsessively read other people’s opinions on who will win, but, because I really don’t remember how accurate they were in the past, I don’t have much of an idea how good their predictions are. I sort of feel the LA Times is a good source because they seem to be the quasi-company paper; I like a website called the House Next Door because they seem to actually be thinking about the nominations; the New York Times because – well – its the New York Times and they have two different ways of predicting.

With those caveats, here are some predictions and what I liked the best of what I saw.

Visual Effects – Probably will win: Avatar; I hope will win: Avatar because that is what it was -and I mean this in the best possible way. 

Avatar

Cinematography – Probably will win: Inglorious Basterds; I hope will win; Inglorious Basterds – I just thought every shot in this movie was gorgeous.

Inglourious_basterds49-jpg
 

Best Actress: Probably will win – Sandra Bullock; probably should win – one of the actresses from one of the movies I didn’t see; I hope will win – Sandra Bullock

Best Actor: Probably will win – Jeff Bridges -his Dudeness – in Crazy Heart which I didn’t see; who I hope will win – George Clooney if for no other reason than he is willing to take a risk but he started off so off-putting and ended up so vulnerable.

Best Supporting Actor: Probably will win – Christoph Waltz; I sure hope so, he was great.

Best Supporting Actress – Mo’Nique; I hope will win -Vera Farmiga who was charming in Up In The Air

Best Original Screenplay: Probably will win – Quentin Tarantino for Inglourious Basterds; I certainly hope so. The only problem here, as I see it, is that Tarantino writes great scenes rather than great movies. The scenes don’t alway fit together into a great movie – he sometimes gets around the problems by putting the scenes out of order as in Pulp Fiction – but, wow, are the scenes great.

Best director: Probably will win – Kathryn Bigelow for The Hurt Locker; I hope will win – Quentin Tarantino for Inglourious Basterds

 


Best Picture: Probably will win – The Hurt Locker; Who I hope will win – Avatar. It was a staggeringly original total experience.

How does he get these people

I love Jon Stewart but I am still constantly amazed at how much actual influence he packs. I'll see a bit, like when he goes after Fox and I'll think, Man, that's great, too bad people in the media who seem to think that Fox is real news don't see it.Then I'll see it referenced in Time or some other mainstream outlet. Here is a bit on a website that….well, I'll let Jon explain it.  

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Tech-Talch – Chatroulette
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Health Care Reform

Banking reform

I just got my credit card bill and I am still wondering how they could have been more cynical. The new bill says, at the very top, in big type on a bold black background, We're continuing to make your statement clearer than ever. It then goes on to say that I'll see an estimate of how long it will take to pay off your current statement balance if you only make the minimum payment on each time period. Now that sound very nice of them except that is required by a new law that went into effect last Monday.

Now here is the cynical part – OK, it is all pretty cynical because the banks fought against this law and now they are acting like it is their idea – so here is the most cynical part. My statement came out just before the new law went into effect and it doesn't have the payoff information on it. They are telling me how they are continuing to make my statement better but they are keeping the information off the statement as long as they legally can.

Every once in a while, I'll get in an argument with somebody over how much big government is weighing us down. I think that Capitalism is great – and BTW, when people say Capitalism, they usually mean Entrepreneur-ism – and Capitalism is largely responsible for us having more shit than any other country, but one thing Capitalism will not do is protect us – or our environment. The purpose of business to make money and get bigger. And that is especially true about banks. 

To NOT pass bank reform is nutty except that banks spend billions to get Congress NOT to pass a bill. Check this out and call your Senator.

 

A pet peeve: F**K

A couple of weeks ago, linguist Geoff Nunberg talked about pet peeves on Fresh Air. He was advocating that a pet peeve is only a pet peeve if it is particular to the peeved. It is not a pet peeve if everybody, or most people – at least – have it. For example not liking people who poison dogs is not a pet peeve.

The other day, I ran across one of my biggest pet peeves. A quote in Time magazine in which in the quote they had f**k. WTF? Why? I think they should either say fuck or @#%&. If they consider themselves a magazine that children, too young to read the word fuck, read; then they should not put it in, they should either put in @#%& or put in an innocuous word like gosh. But everybody but those small children know that f**k means fuck, so who are they kidding – why not just put in fuck.

The New Yorker puts in fuck when it is in a quote and, even occasionally, when it is deemed appropriate by the author. They seem to feel they are dealing with a mature reader. (As an aside, one of my favorite bits in the New Yorker was Anthony Lane’s  in which he says: Also, while we’re here, what’s with (Yoda’s) screwy syntax? Deepest mind in the galaxy, apparently, and you still express yourself like a day-tripper with a dog-eared phrase book. “I hope right you are.” Break me a fucking give.end aside.)

But Time magazine, among others, just want to be cute and, I guess, not offend anybody but adults.