All posts by Steve Stern

Phyllis Jean Heaney

Phylis-001

phyllis

Phylis-1336Michele’s mother, Phyllis Jean Heaney, passed away Saturday night. To paraphrase Walt Whitman, Did she contradict herself? Very well, then she contradicted herself, she was large, she contained multitudes. Phyllis lived life out loud: she loved music and travel, she especially loved her babies – Claudia and Michele – and her husband Jim.

Her brightness and cheer will be much missed and – for awhile – the world will be a dimmer place.

Yesterday, a woman who sat with Michele and her mom, got a new puppy and then we read that our dear friends Peter Kuhlman and Ophelia Ramirez are great grand parents. Michele loves the synchronicity of it and I love the reminder that life is an ever changing river that moves around and through us. True hell is swimming in that river and not getting wet.

 

 

Family and mishpakha

Family-2406Michele has said this much better than I can: I am with my mother, Phyllis Jean Heaney. She is slipping away from us quite rapidly, and peacefully. I would like to add that Michele is also peaceful. She has spent the last couple of days – and nights – with her mother at the Agis assisted living facility.

At the same time, a portion of Michele’s extended, paternal, family – long dispersed by the Holocaust and slowly reforming – had gathered at Tahoe. I had the honor of joining them and showing some of them a smattering of the Smoke Creek Desert, some of the eastern Sierra, and a bit of Yosemite (covered in smoke).

Family-1872

 

 

 

We are going to the mountains for a family reunion

SJA-0679Michele’s paternal family is having a reunion at Squaw Valley. It is especially exciting for me because I get to take some of them on a day trip into the Smoke Creek Desert. After the reunion, we will take a couple of the reunionites down the back way to Mono Lake and then through Yosemite (fire permitting).

 

 

A couple of thoughts while going to the movies

1

We saw Elysium over the weekend and I enjoyed it. As Anthony Lane says in The New Yorker, At last, a good big film….here is something angry and alive, at least until until we tried to make sense of it while driving home. Then it all sort of fell apart. Michele would say Wait a minute, why did they….and I would have no answer.

But during the movie, sitting in the dark, it is engrossing and believable. It is bright and fast and very, very, alive as well as Matt Damon being the perfect everyman for the part. One little bit that made me chuckle was the bad guy’s personal space shuttle was a Bugatti. And it had the gestalt of a Bugatti. As a matter of fact, one of the reasons that the movie worked so well, is that it felt so real, just like the director’s previous movie, District 9.

Going in, we passed a long line of people waiting to see Lee Daniels The Butler and going out, we saw a long line waiting to see Instructions not included, a movie I had never heard of. Elysium had a – probably – majority Hispanic cast and, I found out after I got home Instructions not included is a movie, in Spanish – or mostly Spanish – about guy from Acapulco. I read somewhere that Pacific Rim was filmed to cater to the Asian market. No wonder that the bigots are going crazy, they are losing.

One of the things that appeals to me about Elysium is the director, Neill Blomkamp. Not Neill Blomkamp, per se, but Neill Blomkamp the idea of what is good about Hollywood, or Southern California, if you prefer. A couple of years ago, he was nobody, he made a two minute movie, a four minute movie, after that a six minute movie, finally a fifteen minute movie – no kidding – then District 9.  District 9 was a hit and Hollywood gave him about $110,000,000 to make  Elysium. No where else, that I can think of, is that possible.

Before and after watching Elysium on the big screen, we watched Che on the little screen. Or, more accurately, I watched the first half of Che before Elysium and then I re-watched it with Michele. Che is by Steven Soderbergh, another guy who came out of nowhere. He made a fifteen minute film about sex to interest investors for his full length film Sex, Lies & Videotape (also about sex, duh!).

Sex, Lies & Videotape made about $24,741,700 on an investment of $1,200,000 and Soderbergh was off and running, cranking out an Ocean’s Eleven or Twelve every time he needed money to make a Bubble or a Che. Che is hugely ambitious and can be seen as either one four and an half hour film or two two hour films depending on how you want to watch it. I went for the bifurcated version and have only seen the first half so far. It is a a slow, almost zen meditation on guerrilla war. For a long time it seems to go nowhere and then I began to realize that it was subtly pulling me along a path that I hadn’t realized I was on.

The photography – in the jungle especially – is one of the main characters. Benicio Del Torro is Che and his performance is an understated tour de force.  I can not imagine two movies more different than Elysium and Che, they are both very worth seeing but, for me Che is the more powerful and memorable.

che-part-2-guerrilla-8

 

Syria

Feeling lucky? I read a couple of days ago that only about nine percent of the American public wants us to get into a war over Syria. Count me in the other 93% on this one. It is easy to say that Americans are tired of war, and we are, but there also seems to be a no plan problem here. How does a Syrian intervention fit into our overall Middle Eastern Strategy? Oh, and by the way, what is out overall Middle Eastern Strategy?

According to Reuters, The United States made clear on Friday that it would punish Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for the “brutal and flagrant” chemical weapons attack that it says killed more than 1,400 people in Damascus last week. What wasn’t made clear is that any punishing of Bashar al-Assad is really punishing someone else. By killing them, or trying to kill them.

If revenge is a dish best served cold, punishment is a dish best served hot. The longer we wait, the less it seems like there is a connection between what we are doing and what Syria did.

Obama said yesterday that we have to attack Assad, because our credibility is on the line. In other words, he is saying we are going to to destroy stuff in Syria and kill people in Syria for reasons that have nothing to do with Syria. It is now because our credibility is on the line. If our reason becomes about us, it really is not legitimate. The only legitimate reason for bombing Syria is to save Syrian lives and suffering. Bombing to save face isn’t bombing Syria to help its people.

It also seems to me that if we threaten to bomb somebody next time it,  it would still be a threat even if we didn’t bomb this time. It still would depend on the circumstances.