Monthly Archives: October 2010

The power of one person

Deming1

For me, two of the  most powerful books on the Holocaust are The Winds of War and War and Reremembrance.  Reading about Aaron Jastrow, and his niece Natalie, being sucked into, eventually, the  Auschwitz concentration camp is excruciating even though it was not the main plot, as I recall. or is it real. But there is something about giving a face and a personality to one -OK, two in this case – poor, doomed soul that packs an  immense punch.

I remembered reading that Margret Meed once said in an answer to a question on what can one person do? Can one person or a small group of thoughtful people change the world? Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. (It tuns out that is not exactly what she said but it is pretty close.) I was reminded of that when I read a comment to a ta-nehisi-coates blog. The comment said

One of the most sobering things I've seen here in Germany hasn't been at the concentration camps. It's on the streets of essentially random cities, towns and villages. The paving stones in front of certain houses have been engraved to acknowledge that the residents of the house were taken away to X concentration camp. One stone per person, often several generations of a family. Birth dates are given as are dates of death . . . if known. One simply can't walk past something like without thinking what . . . how . . . shit.

The pavers are called stolpersteins and they are by a German artist, Gunter Demnig. Each brass paver – really a brass cap made by the artist – has the name of  a woman, man or child who was  deported by the Nazis. By himself, at first but now with others helping, Deming came up with the idea of turning the millions and millions of people killed by the Nazis – primarily Jewish people, but also, Roma, homosexuals, retarded people -  back into real people. Back into neighbors that lived next door or, even, in your home.

Stolpersteine-1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October is new car month

For as long as I can remember, I have been interested in cars – loved cars, really.  And the best month for car lovers, when I was young, was October. It still is. October is the month that the new cars for next year hit the showrooms.

When I was a young teenager, before I could drive, we would walk down to what was then known as Auto Row and visit each dealership. It was thrilling and I still remember it today. Then the dealers were all American except for one small dealer, British Motors, that sold Jaguars, MGs, Triumphs, and, I think, Alfa Romeos. Cars like Chevrolet, Plymouth, DeSoto, and Oldsmobile each had their own dealer and we would spend an afternoon looking at all of them. Now, according to Auto Week, there are 340 cars and trucks on the market and no way to walk each dealership. Even more thrilling.

My first actual car getting experience was when I was fourteen. My mother asked my advice on what car to get and I suggested a Buick Century. That was 1954 and the Buick Century was a hotrod with the small Buick body and a big Buick – the awesome Roadmaster – 322 cubic inch V8 that put out 177 raging HP.

My mother agreed – I was the family car expert after all -  and bought a white (with a bluish cast so, in some lights, it looked pale, pale blue) brand new, hardtop convertible. 1954_Buick_Century_Riviera-dec27b

Two years later, I got my first car or, more accurately, collection of car parts. A five window deuce. (Technically, a deuce is a 1932 Ford and my car was a Plymouth, but What the hell; it was close enough to call a deuce.)  I also acquired, separately – I think -  a ford flathead engine with 3 Stromberg 97 carburetors, and a 3 speed Lincoln-Zephyr transmission. Eventually, the parts became a car that looked much like the car below, including the black primer and channeled body, except nowhere as good. My deuce ran, but not really good enough to get anywhere.

1932-Ford-5-Window-Coupe-Matte-Black-FA-sy

Meanwhile, my grandparents were getting old and had stopped driving so I bought their 1948 Pontiac 4 door sedan – what the hell, again, if it had been Italian, it would have been called a quatroporte – and that was the car that first took me backpacking.

 

Getting a new computer

My trusty old Sony  PCV-1154 has been on it's deathbed for a while: getting slower and slower, jamming, sometimes starting with out the mouse or keyboard working – requiring a re-start or a re-restart – sometimes going into hibernation without warning, or, just, jamming.  In shopping for a new computer, I am struck by two things. How quickly everything changes and how unsatisfactory just upgrading something like a computer is.

When I bought the Sony, it was state of the art. It was so state of the art and so powerful that it had to have a glycol cooling system. Now it is hopelessly out of date with inadequate storage and almost no memory (2 GB after three upgrades); our cheap diningroom table, "why don't you look it up", laptop is more powerful. It is hard to find a desktop, now. Most computers are laptops or copies of Apple's all in one screen-only idea.

And, I really lust after a MacBook Air but it is not powerful enough to be my only computer and way too expensive to be a "use only on trip" toy. I lust after a MacBook Pro but the screen is too small and it is even more expensive than a MacBook Air. All I need is a desktop – and why do they call it a desktop when people put them under the desk, anyway? – and a HP PC desktop with a fast processor, 8 gigs of memory, and a terra bite of storage is only $700.

It is not a very satisfactory transaction, however. $700 lighter and two days of Windows Easy Transfer later, it feels like I am back where I started.  If I had spent the $700 on art or – say – twenty coffee table books, I could see the great improvement of my life. True, it is better than buying a new camera in which – after unwrapping everything and taking several pictures of nothing in particular – seems like money just pissed away until the next vacation. But still…..

There is some upside, I have to admit. The Windows Easy Transfer was*; Windows 7 is much better than my old Windows XP; and I am now processing pictures at 64 something which makes for clearer more vibrant pictures with no bad breath. See

Untitled-0366

 

*easy, that is.

 

The New Canon.

Blade_runner_movie_image_joanna_cassidy

In the comments section on my post on being in the Oakland Museum  – and the New York Times – Tracy Grubbs wrote Your layout reminds me of that scene in Blade Runner. If you keep zooming in you'll find those fake snake scales on her sweater, really. About two weeks ago, an economist from the Obama Whitehouse referenced the Matrix.

Both comments sort of surprised me. And neither one should have. Blade Runner and Matrix are part of the New Canon.  They have become larger than they were when they were just movies. They are part of our culture, like Casablanca or Anne Hall. They somehow exemplify the new zeitgeist.

 

Inequality

FRANCE-MonacoYachts

According to a very interesting book review at Slate, Right now the wealthiest one percenters grab 24 percent of annual income in this country. That's even more than the 15 to 18 percent they hauled in during the robber baron era of the Carnegies, Rockefellers and Vanderbilts.

I think that most of us know that the rich are getting richer and everybody else is treading water or getting poorer but I had now idea that the inequality was this severe. The top one percent of the wealthiest people in America make essentially 1/4 of all the income in America. True, the Bush years were very good to the very wealthy, but the trend started way before Bush and it is still going on under that socialist, Obama..

I think that this is a big part of the reason so many people are so angry. I know that I am angry about it.