I drove up to San Francisco to photo the full moon from the Golden Gate Bridge as it came up. Well, that was the plan:  but when I got to South San Francisco, the fog was blowing  across 280.  I figured it would be worse at the Golden Gate, so I bailed on that and drove to Twin Peaks. Looking down on the bridge, I figured I was right.

But the view back at downtown was clear with just a wisp of fog hanging out by Berkeley.

I knew the moon would be coming up too far south for me to get a shot of it over San Fran and that it would be coming up too late for many lights to still be on in buildings downtown but it was a warm – if windy – night so I stuck around. The sun set through the fog behind us as the moon rose over the Hayward Hills.

“Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma—which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.”—Stanford Commencement Address, 2005

I lived in Palo Alto in the mid 80s. The home I lived in was typical of the area: it was around 1,700 feet and cost $236,000. The whole experience seemed normal, the top of the normal range but, still, a normal suburban life. Behind us was a family from Peru who had moved to Palo Alto so their daughter could be treated for anorexia at Stanford. They would occasionally talk about how much different their lives were in Peru where they had servants to serve them and guards to protect them.

When I went to Peru  – to go to Machu Picchu among other things – I timed the trip to spend a couple of days with my neighbors at their home in Lima. It seemed so unlike the United States, the houses had gates and guards (24/7 as we would say now). In Palo Alto, they were swimming in the normalcy of suburban life; in Peru, they were cut off.

A couple of days ago, I was driving by where I used to live and I stopped to walk around the area for a few minutes. The place looked pretty much the same, but it felt entirely different. There were still small houses like the one below,

and bigger houses

and even bigger houses, all of which had been there when I lived there.

That is not the real difference. The real difference is that everything just feels richer. Every house is refurbished, every detail is done in the most expensive way it can be done.

A little further along, I came across a blue box that sort of looked like a conex container.

I also saw a large pipe dumping water into the storm system but I didn’t connect the two. It turns out that they were building a new house – that was pretty obvious – and the new house has a very deep basement. Not a basement in which to put a heater, but a huge basement filling the whole lot. The guy I talked to said that they ran into an underground river but I suspect that they had just gone down lower than the water table. Either way they ran into water and had to pump it out but it was too contaminated – I don’t know with what; saltwater? the state rock, asbestos? – to pump into the storm system so they had to install this huge filtration plant.

According to Zillow, this 8,400 sq. foot lot sold for $1,700,000 a little more than a year ago. My guess is that they hadn’t planned on the filtration plant needed to build their basement. A couple of weeks ago, I talked to a guy who was thinking about moving to Palo Alto from San Francisco but was getting discouraged. He said that he was willing to pay $1,000 per square foot of house but not $2,000 per foot.  A real estate broker I talked to a couple of months before that said that 32% of the houses in Palo Alto – over $1,200,000 – sold for all cash. This is where the rich people live.

This has become one of the most expensive places to live in the world. As I was walking by Steve Jobs house with my camera,

a guy came up to me and said Do you mind if I walk along with you? He looked like a cop and I asked him if he were – was? – a cop and he said No. He was a security guard watching Job’s house. And he wasn’t like a mall security guard, he was like a Russian mafia security guard. We talked for a couple of minutes and – among other things, like Do me a favor, stay on this side of the street. –   he said that there were about 30 other security guards nearby. It reminded me of Peru.

soft air pale blue sky

a bat flew into our home

leaves will turn red soon

I know that this sounds like bullshit, but I think in a strange, counterintuitive  way, it really is true.

Let me explain but, first, let me repeat a typical rant we are given almost daily. I lifted the following quote a couple of days ago and now I don’t remember where but it doesn’t really make any difference because similar things are everywhere.

In the face of economic trouble, Republicans in Congress keep asking Americans for “shared sacrifice,” all the while continuing to give billions of dollars in subsidies to Big Oil companies. We’re lining Big Oil’s pockets, while Big Oil pays for Congress to vote in their best interest instead of ours. While Congress tells us we need to sacrifice health care, social security and other vital services in 2011 alone Big Oil companies received at least $4 billion in tax breaks, all while reporting record profits. Despite the big five oil companies making record profits this year, Congress keeps saying Big Oil is paying its “fair share.

All this is true; we – we being our government with money they got from us – do give billions in subsidies to oil companies. More than just tax breaks, other things too, like using the Coast Guard to protect their drilling islands, charging us to clean up their daily polluting, and the list could go on for pages. And they do make tons of money, Exxon, for example, has a good start this year with its profit up by almost 70% for the first quarter, making $10,650,000,000 – that is lots of zeros – profit. For the first quarter of year alone. BTW, it paid its CEO about $5, 750,000 for last year so he should expect another good year.

But all these numbers are sort of beside the point, because Exxon is not going to take  a hit on its profits no matter how much better this quarter is and the CEO is not going to take less money next year. If they don’t get their tax break, they are just going to raise the price of gas to get back to where they were. We are going to pay for it in our taxes and the deterioration of our schools and infrastructure or we are going to pay for it at the pump. Either way, we are going to pay it.

My preferrance is that we pay for it at the pump even though I am a big gas user. The only chance we have of making people use less gas – including me – is to have the real cost of gas included in the gas including the cost of the damage that is done by all of us driving. My guess is that it would make gas cost about $10 a gallon at the pump and I wonder if that would actually thin out many drivers.