Category Archives: Politics

Mamdani & The NY Mayoral Race

Americana, Current Affairs, Politics
Doctored picture used by the Cuomo campaign of Mamdan with a heavier and darker beard.

Those Democrats who think Mamdani will hurt their party are right to be concerned, but they’re thinking about the problem the wrong way. It’s not the skeptics they need to worry about. It’s the fans. Those Democrats who think Mamdani will hurt their party are right to be concerned, but they’re thinking about the problem the wrong way. It’s not the skeptics they need to worry about. It’s the fans. Ramesh Ponnuru, the editor of National Review and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in an editorial in the Washington Post entitled How Zohran Mamdani is teaching Democrats to lose.

I can’t speak to how other people feel, but I can say that as a Jewish New Yorker and as a member of a Jewish organization, I think that Zohran has done an incredible job of demonstrating care and concern and shown a real commitment to ensuring the safety of Jewish New Yorkers, of all New Yorkers. Sophie Ellman-Golan, director of strategic communications at Jews For Racial & Economic Justice

I’m not going to let this Communist Lunatic destroy New York, President Donald Trump, after Mamdani’s primary win (and was repeated in August).

Your dedication to an affordable, welcoming, and safe New York City where working families can have a shot has inspired people across the city. Billionaires and lobbyists poured millions against you and our public finance system. And you won. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, US representative for New York’s 14th congressional district

The Anti-Mamdani Movement Is Fizzling New York Magazine

Zohran Mamdani is running for mayor of New York City. He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America – which is the largest Socialist group in the United States – is 33 years old, a practising Muslim, and, surprisingly, he will probably be the next mayor of New York City. And those are not the most surprising parts of the story. He was born in Kampala, Africa, and moved here when he was seven with his parents,  Mahmood Mamdani, a professor at Columbia University and Mira Nair. The same Mira Nair who is the director of  Mississippi Masala, Monsoon Wedding, and the Amelia Earhart biopic, Amelia, starring Hilary Swank and Richard Gere.

Mamdani holds political positions that Conventional Wisdom, and a big hunk of the Democratic Party’s leadership, think – maybe hope is more accurate – it should be impossible for him to win anything, even a Municipal Dogcatcher Position. As a short aside, about 12% of people in New York City are Jewish, and 2.4% are Indian, and Mamdani has said both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are war criminals and would be jailed if they came to New York if he were mayor. End aside. And he most probably will be the next mayor of New York City.

Mamdani is running on a platform that includes free city buses and a rent freeze in rent-stabilized housing; he advocates for universal childcare and pre-kindergarten childcare, as well as the construction of 200,000 new affordable housing units and five city-owned grocery stores—one in each borough—to drive down grocery prices. He was also an early supporter of Defund the Police and continues to support public safety reform. He supports a $30 minimum wage by 2030 and proposed giving all new New York City families baby baskets containing diapers and nursing supplies. Mamdani’s platform calls for tax increases on corporations and those earning above $1 million annually. He is running against a lot of very powerful special interests, and I am thrilled that he will probably be the next mayor of New York City.

While I am admittedly biased, the biggest reason I say he will be the next mayor of New York City is that the polls say that. Still, I have other reasons he is likely to become the mayor of New York City: he is young, personable, and, most importantly, authentic; the populace is tired of dour old men running the country for themselves, and Mamdani is running on ideas that are popular even though the conventional wisdom says they are loony tunes.

There is another reason, besides the City of New York’s—and the country’s—general discontent with the status quo, that I think Zohran Mamdani will win, and it is very similar to why Trump won in both 2016 and 2024. To back up a little, there are three ways the Main Stream Media covers elections, and the New York Times and CNN in 2016 are the best examples of that. If they like a candidate, like Hillary Clinton, they give them lots of good, thoughtful – or seemingly thoughtful – coverage. BTW, lots is the operative word in the previous sentence. If they don’t like the candidate, like Bernie Sanders, they ignore him. Just ignore him, and people will forget that the candidate is even running. Or, if they dislike the candidate, like Donald Trump, they will constantly badmouth him. The last way is counterproductive; it ended up keeping Trump in the public’s conscience, and that is what is happening to Zohran Mamdani right now.

Greenland And Slanting The Truth

Politics

Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity. The modern champions of communism have selected this as the time, and ladies and gentlemen, the chips are down, they are truly down. Joseph McCarthy, communist hunter and US senator, circa 1950

I do not think the mainstream press is equipped or capable of covering ideological white nationalists and eugenicists as such, or even capable of noting that this is what they are. it is related to the wide belief that racism is simply a matter of manners. ‪jamelle‬ ‪(at)jamellebouie.net‬ The real jbouie. Columnist for the New York Times Opinion section. Co-host of the Unclear and Present Danger podcast. b-boy-bouiebaisse on TikTok. National program director of the CHUM Group.

When I was a freshman in college, sometime around the end of 1957, we were shown a propaganda movie made by HUAC as part of our orientation package. HUAC stands for the House Un-American Activities Committee, and, according to the Harry S. Truman Library, it was created in 1938 to investigate alleged disloyalty and rebel activities on the part of private citizens, public employees, and organizations suspected of having Communist ties. Citizens suspected of having ties to the communist party would be tried in a court of law.

The power that HUAC had, and the fear that power generated, seems absurd now – or it did, six months ago, anyway – but 1957 was a different time. Sometime in the thirties, we – well, some of us anyway – became obsessed with fighting Godless Communism, which was a threat, or a perceived threat anyway, to our national religion, Capitalism. 1957, when I saw the HUAC movie which was required part of Freshman Orientation, was four years after Senator Joseph McCarthy, a Republican from Wisconsin, embarrassed himself and the country as the Chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Senate Government Operations Committee, whatever the hell that means, and I thought – as I remember it, we all thought – that the going-after commies hysteria had passed.

As an aside, I knew HUAC was a house committee, and I knew that McCarthy was a Senator, but somehow, over the last 68 years, I’ve connected them in my psyche. But they were not connected, and the December 1954 censure of McCarthy by the Senate did not slow down the craziness of HUAC. End aside.

All that I remember about HUAC’s movie was how ridiculously exaggerated it was, and while I haven’t thought about that movie in years – probably 65 years – I was reminded of it by another ridiculously exaggerated movie that I just saw on FOX. Apparently, it was commissioned by President Trump to promote his Greenland adventure.

I ended up at FOX because I got angry at the reporting of the Wisconsin Supreme Court fight in the New York Times and Washington Post. I’m not angry that we won, I’m very happy about that, it’s my side that won after all. I’m angry at the biased reporting. I want my reporting to be unbiased and neutral (fair and balanced, if you will). Otherwise, I can’t trust it and can’t rely on it.

But, not surprisingly, FOX way outdid the New York Times in terms of craziness. They didn’t bother with the Wisconsin Supreme Court fight, choosing instead to feature the afore mentioned movie (displayed on Trump’s X account to aswage the doubts that this is real).

(The end of this post has been changed as the video that was originally posted here was preventing the post from loading properly).

Why Didn’t We See That Train Coming ?

Current Affairs, Politics

Donald Trump is a stupid man’s idea of a smart person, a poor man’s idea of a rich man, and a weak man’s idea of a strong man. Fran Lebowitz.

I thought Vice President Kamala Harris and Tim Waltz were going to win the last election. I even wrote several posts about it, such as Why Harris & Walz Will Win. Unfortunately, the proverb Seeing is believing is backward. Actually, believing is seeing. I live in a bubble of beliefs that define how I see reality. In my reality, my bubble, not being an asshole is essential, and knowing what the job is and how to do it is important.

However, most people who voted in the last election are not in my bubble, and I didn’t see their discontent that trumped Trump’s assholery and incompetence. I’m still trying to figure out why I didn’t see that anger, but I think I’m starting to understand part of it.

I want to start with a story that is not about politics (well, sort of not about politics, anyway). Years ago, in, I am going to guess, 1967, Sam Berland, my boss – I say “boss” because, even though we were partners, he had been my boss at our previous company, and I still thought of him as my boss – and I agreed to take on a third partner. Sam had met a man, who I’ll call Jim, about the same age as me, who worked for a lumber company that had gotten into the recreational land-for-sale business and was now trying to get out by liquidating their holdings. Sam thought Jim would be perfect as a partner and land expert.

Jim’s boss, who Sam knew, gave Jim an outstanding recommendation, as did a co-worker Sam also knew. We hired Jim with the plan of making him our third partner. We didn’t make him a partner, but, in this case, even an almost partner was a disaster, alienating everybody he interacted with, and it cost us a lot of money to get rid of him.

A couple of years later, I ran into the co-worker who had given Sam the excellent recommendation and asked him why he had done that. His answer surprised me. Jim had blown the whistle on a couple of employees who had been skimming money off of the escrows on the land sales, and consequently, Jim was revered by the company’s top brass. But he was a jerk, and none of his coworkers liked him. Jim disrupted the office, but they couldn’t fire him. All they could do was hope somebody else would hire him, so when we came along, they were thrilled and gave us a very positive recommendation.

Because Jim was a jerk and ostracized by his co-workers, he was, in effect, a permanent outsider. He was in the right place to see the employees skimming, but most of his co-workers and his boss were also in the same place. But unlike his co-workers and boss, his vision wasn’t clouded by friendships or the pressure of conformity, and he could more clearly see what was going on.

Trump is like that. Like most of us, he is in a position to see the growing disparity between the college-educated elite rich* and the rest of the country. But he also saw the monetary and psychic damage done by sending good jobs out of the country and letting in poor, desperate people who would work for less money, thereby taking away more good jobs. I keep thinking, Why did he see that pain and anger, and none of us did? He’s a rich narcissist. How did he see what most of us didn’t and many still don’t?

First, like Jim, Trump was an outsider for most of his life. An ill-mannered guy from Queens, trying to make it in Manhattan society but never fitting in. Like Jim, Donald Trump was not hindered by friendships or the pressure of conformity. He was an outsider and felt mistreated; more importantly, he felt disrespected.

It’s easy to say that Trump projected that feeling of being disrespected onto the people he wanted to attract, and this may be true. But it is also true, and may be hard to admit for most of us, that we college-educated elite rich* don’t respect or value people who aren’t as educated, nor do we consider them worth listening to. I know that all of us do respect some people who aren’t college-educated, but that is only after we get to know them as individuals; as a group, we don’t listen to them or interact with them. Trump did and does.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

*Even though it is buried in a footnote, I want to be clear: we are the elite rich, and while we might not think of ourselves as rich or elite, we are definitely rich compared to people living paycheck to paycheck or afraid of losing their homes if they get sick.

“Oh No”:A Couple of Some Not Entirely Random Thouhts

Japan, Politics, Travel

“We Have Met the Enemy and He Is Us” Pogo (well. Walt Kelly, really).

We’re not in the US, but I can feel the trauma, the shock, of the election. The people voted, and the majority of them didn’t vote the way we wanted and expected them to vote. A couple of days ago, at a Craft Fair at the Shiinoki Cultural Complex in Kanazawa, Michele got into a conversation with a local, and he asked, “Why?” Michele said she didn’t have an answer.

I don’t really either. But the distraction of being in a new environment gives me the luxury of not thinking about it very much. That makes it easy for me to fall back on my old answers, and I don’t think, at 84, my old answers are really the answers that fit today. My politics are almost a perfect match with Senator Bernie Sanders, so I love his answers, but as much as I love them, I think Bernie’s answers are outdated.

What I do think, however, is that Harris and the Democrats didn’t lose because Harris didn’t go on Joe Rogan enough or used the wrong typeface in her ads. I don’t even think that Harris lost because we are a sexist or racist nation. We are, probably, but that’s not why we lost. I think we lost because the economy was better under Trump. It turns out that most people thought their lives were better under Trump. I don’t mean because of Trump; I think Trump looked good because he inherited the fruits of the Obama recovery. But that may just be my Liberal rationalization.

Coastal California is one of the most Liberal parts of the country, and our Liberal policies have not solved any of our biggest problems. California has the largest homeless population in the country, and we give our children a shitty education. We are #37 in Pre-K-12 education and #22 in High School Graduation Rate, according to U.S. News & World Report. How can that be if our ideas are so much better than, say, Florida, ranked #10 in Pre-K-12 education and #19 in High School Graduation, or Georgia, #25,#17?

What we do do well is take care of our elite selves. Silicon Valley is booming; we have 186 billionaires, an almost infinite number of millionaires, and our elite colleges are the best in the world. We have great parks – National, State, and local – and we keep the homeless out so we don’t have to see them and feel bad or even guilty. Many of our highways are perpetually congested, so we are making special lanes so those who can afford it can pay a little money – for them – to get where they want to go faster.

Don’t get me wrong; I love my life in the United States of America, and especially in California, but the laws and policies are made for me – by people like me – and that is not the way to get votes from people who are not like me. I don’t know what the answers are, but I do know that saying that people who voted for Trump are stupid or saying that Trump is a fascist is not effective.

Well, Shit

Politics, Psychological Musings

Populist Revolt Against Elite’s Vision of the U.S. New York Times

Not really a big surprise, still a big shock. It’s very likely not as bleak as it looks this morning.

It’s probably going to be a little worse if you are Jewish, or Muslim, or undocumented, or a woman, or anything but white European male, for that matter. The white male hierarchy – and it must be larger than I imagined from the viewpoint deep in my little bubble – will have more legitimacy.

The very rich will do better, NATO and Ukraine worse, but in our day-to-day lives, we (Michele and myself and most people we know) probably won’t notice much change .