Monthly Archives: September 2012

Romney and forced errors

I used to think that Mitt Romney was a very smart man. “Used” is the operative word, here.  Now, I no longer think that he is that smart and I feel, vaguely, sorry for him. As a fellow – but almost infinitely poorer –  businessman, that bothers me. If he is not very smart, how did he make so much money? I know that he started with money, but, but, unlike George W. Bush who started with money from his father’s connections and ended up with less, Romney parlayed his wealthy start into making even more money. According to our national mythology, he has to be smart.

When you are the richest guy in the room, it must be hard not to think that you are also the the smartest guy in the room. After all, Romney is rich, he did make lots of money, and to many people – perhaps most – that is what “being successful” means. He is much richer than Obama so he must be smarter. Paul Ryan said it well when he said, “When I was waiting tables, washing dishes, or mowing lawns for money, I never thought of myself as stuck in some station in life. I was on my own path, my own journey, an American journey where I could think for myself, decide for myself, define happiness for myself.”  By inference, somebody who does think of themself as stuck in some low station in life – just because they were born black, or grew-up in poverty – is either not very smart or does not have the proper American character (it may not be their fault, but it is not Paul Ryan’s fault, either).

And this is where I feel sorry for Romney. I imagine that Romney thought that once he had a chance to go mano-a-mano with Obama, he – Romney – would have no problem beating him. After all, Obama’s base’s enthusiasm is down, the economy is in the tank and not getting better; how could Romney not beat him? And yet, Romney is slowly losing ground.

Somehow, Obama has a way of making forced errors. It happened to Bill Clinton in South Carolina, it happened to John McCain over the economy meltdown, and now it is starting to happen to Mitt Romney. He should be able to win on the economy but he keeps wandering off to other topics. He is not going to win by making Obama look friendly to radical Muslims! he is not going to win on birth control, and, yet, somehow he ends up there trying to double down on a stupid statement. It must be infuriating to a guy like Romney who is, after all, the smartest guy in the room.

My kind of people

 

Watching the two political conventions, I was impressed by the difference in the crowds. Maybe it was the result of the cameramen trying to make them look different, but I doubt it. It is not just the color of Conventioneer skin, the variety of dress vs. the lack of variety, that caught my – and the cameraman’s – eye, it was the tenor. The Democrats seemed to be having fun; the Republicans weren’t.

In 1964, I remember talking to my dad about the Republican National Convention that was being held in San Francisco. (I had been to the 1960 Democratic Convention in Los Angeles – not officially – and Los Angeles was one giant party and I had expected San Francisco to be the same.) My dad thought it would be pretty dull saying that the Republicans just didn’t have as much fun; that the Democrats were big spenders, big partiers, while the Republicans were – for lack of a better word – conservative. It turned out that my dad was right, San Francisco was pretty boring during the Convention.

Even more now than in 1964, the Republicans just seem pissed. And full of hate for Obama. Irrational hate.

Yesterday, Obama visited the Big Apple Pizza somewhere in Florida and the exuberant owner – a Republican – picked up Obama. It turns out that he voted for Obama in 2008 and will vote for him again this year. Apparently the Yelposhere went nuts with Conservatives bad-mouthing the pizarra.

Notice how Yelp only published “reviews” from libtards…just goes to show you how biased coverage of the annointed one is. More hate comes from the dumbocrats than anywhere else.

Food was terrible, atmosphere even worse, emplyees were discourteous, was going to bring 500 students there for stop before and after Disneyworld.  After him, a proclaimed Republican, embracing, bearhugging Obama.  Wouldn’t recommend this restaurant even for Obamas Dog, Bo,  Stay away from this place
john John is listed as being from Rockville, MD. Is he so clueless as to think we will believe this is a real review? or is he just so filled with hate?

Horrible food, dirty, rude staff.  Saw roaches crawling around and flies all over the food in the kitchen.  Don’t waste your time or money, unless you enjoy getting sick. From a guy in Tacoma WA.

The pizza left a bad taste in my mouth…. Tasted like poo…God bless America!! Mark, from Lake Forest IL.

I don’t know what bothers and surprises me the most, the hate or the cluelessness. I guess that it is the hate that most surprises me. I expected it even less than the cluelessness. I just didn’t know that there was that much hate out there. To me, Obama is just not that liberal, although I guess that I would qualify as a libtard (umm…should that have a capital “L”, like Libtard?).

Forgetting Obama, forgetting Romney, just going by the crowd, the ones I want to hang out with is the crowd at the Democratic Convention. The crowd having fun, the crowd backing the guy who I want to win. 

 

Rupert Sheldrake and Morphic Resonance

 

Last Thursday, Michele took me to see a talk by the Right Reverend Marc Handley Andrus – the  Eighth Episcopalian Bishop of California – Healer Jill Purce, and  Dr. Rupert Sheldrake at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco. I really went to see Sheldrake who was the only one of the three that I had heard of. More importantly, I went to see him because Rupert – I think I can call him Rupert because that is how Michele, who met him at Hollyhock a couple off years ago, introduced him to me – is a genius at the same level as Alfred Wegener. Or Charles Darwin, for that matter. I first read Rupert’s Theory of Morphic Resonance a little more than twenty years ago and it has both enriched my life beyond any expectation and come to inform my thinking on almost every subject.

I have never heard or read Rupert describing The Morphic Field as being The Cloud, but I think that is an good description. Conventional Wisdom says that the universe is like a machine: its composition, morphology, and actions are all a result of mechanical processes built into the machine itself. It says we grow into who we become because of the DNA we have at birth. Morphic Resonance says that it is more complicated, it says that information is carried outside of us in a Morphic Field that is both influenced by us and that, in turn, influences us.

The Conventional Wisdom says that there are universal, unchanging, physical laws such as the  gravitational constant – known as the Big G – or the speed of light (299,792,458 meters per second). The problem is that, when tested, these constants change. Scientists, like anybody else who holds a strong belief, say that their belief is correct so the measurements must be wrong. But the constants actually do fluctuate and Rupert says that is because they are more like universal Habits that are not locked in. There was no gravity before the Big Bang  because there was nothing to have gravity on. After The Big Bang, a couple of particles were attracted together and they, in turn, influenced another particle to be attracted. Gravity was born, not as an Universal Law, but as a Habit. In other words, as the Universe unfolded, it developed the Habit we call Gravity. This process of the first two particles influencing another particles is what Rupert calls Morphic Resonance and it operates on everything and builds with repetition. The more similar any two anythings are, the more they Resonate.

( The Big Bang was first used by Fred Hoyle to bad mouth what he thought was a ridiculous theory on the life of the universe (the Big Bang is now considered fact, but then Hoyle thought it was ridiculous because it didn’t agree with his, then more widely accepted,  theory of a steady state universe). Last Thursday, I noticed that both Rupert and the Rt. Rev. Andrus referred to the Big Bang as The Great Unfolding so I will too.)

Another example of the Morphic Field influence is the formation of crystals. As crystals are formed by precipitating from a solution, we can tell what material the crystals are by their shape. Quartz, or fluoride, or tourmaline, or any crystal has its own distinctive crystalline pattern; not because of any mathematical or universal law that anybody has been able to fathom. The Habit of that material is to form in that distinctive pattern because, at random, the first time the material precipitated, it formed in that structure and then got in the Habit.

Everything Resonates and is both influenced and influences. We are corporal beings, mammals, and primates and, as such, we resonate with other physical matter – we are influenced by Gravity, for example – with other mammals, and other primates, in our behavior and morphology. Roger Bannister running a four minute mile enables future runners to easier run four minutes miles by changing the Morphic Field.

Conventional wisdom says that the universe – by analogy – is a machine with no purpose but Rupert says that the Universe and all its parts  are better thought of as  Organisms. A machine is non-thinking and can not self-replicate or self organize. An Organism – by definition – does self-replicate and self organizes towards the increasingly complex. Atoms form molecules, molecules form cells, cells form living things, and on and on until – so far – we have sentient beings. The Universe, and everything in it, is self organizing toward complexity, towards us.

Going to see Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, for me, was somewhat of a pilgrimage. What I expected was to go to a lecture in a classroom associated with the actual Grace Cathedral, but, it turned out, we were directed to the Grace Cathedral Choir area making it even more pilgrimage-like.

There were about one hundred of us sitting sitting in the Great Quire listening to, what I am not-sure-to-call, a religious experience, a performance, or a lecture – a little of all three, I guess – and, while that was going to be the point of this post, I think I will continue it in a couple of days and a little more thought.